No! Homeopathy Is Not ‘Fake’! An Open Letter To Dr.Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Nobel Laureate.

JANUARY 7, 2016

Sir,  we all Indians are proud of you for your glorious achievements as a scientist, and your contributions to the advanced studies on structure and functions of ribosomes,  that was duely recognized by the Swedish academy awarding the Nobel prize in 2009. We are very much happy to welcome you to your home land.

A statement you recently made in Chennai regarding homeopathy has created much controversy. You are reported to have said during a public address that  ‘homeopathy works on belief’ and homeopathy is a ‘fake discipline like astrology’. That statement pained homeopathic community a lot, where as it is being enthusiastically utilized by those who regularly attack homeopathy.

Actually, you were echoing the words of ‘anti-homeopathy’ skeptics of western world who are engaged in exposing the ‘pseudo-scientific’ homeopathic theoreticians propagating ‘spiritual homeopathy’ and ‘energy medicine’. I am sorry to say that you failed to realize the entirely different ground realities existing in India in the field of homeopathic education and practice.

Homeopathy has been consistently attacked in this way for last 250 years since its inception, but in spite of all these malicious attacks, homeopathy is thriving in India as a major recognized branch of public health care system.

Hope you would know India is home to around 285,000 registered homeopaths, 186 prestigious homeopathic colleges imparting UG and PG courses, over 6000 government homeopathic dispensaries and about 250 government hospitals. More than 15000 student come out of these colleges every year with BHMS degree, after completing a rigorous five and half year course of study and internship, for which they got admission by scoring top rankings in entrance examinations after 12 years of schooling in science streams. Curriculum of BHMS course constitutes Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, Practice of Medicine and all subjects of modern health care knowledge. There is a Central Council of Homeopathy under Government of India, constituted as per a n Central Act passed by Indian parliament, overseeing everything in the field of homeopathic education, research and practice in India.

Homeopathy is a very important wing of public health care system in inIndia. Homoeopathic wings are working in many allopathic hospitals and dispensaries, both government and private.  Homoeopathic doctors provide treatment to millions of patients for different day to day illnesses in the public health care system. Even during sporadic and epidemic conditions, people tend to use homoeopathic drugs for prevention.  Recently, the Indian Government successfully ran a national health campaign ‘Homeopathy for a Healthy Mother & a Happy Child’, which was based exclusively on homoeopathy. Also, private homeopathic practitioners are contributing a great deal in public health care through their private or charitable clinics.

Besides clinical research, there are fundamental, drug standardization, drug proving and clinical verification research going on, both at government and private levels. For example, the Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy is conducting a lot of such research, either independently or in collaboration with other research institutes or individual researchers, under an extra-mural research scheme at the Dept of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare of the Indian Government. Other than that, almost all homoeopathic organizations and individuals are doing their bit toward research for the further validation of homoeopathy in today’s times of evidence-based medicine. The results have been encouraging, to say the least. In fact, over the years,Indiahas learnt better ways of conducting research from their international counterparts and the recent research has been carried out as per standardized, internationally recognized methods and are therefore more acceptable.

A few exemplary results from clinical  studies include work on tubercular lymphadenitis, japanese encephalitis, etc. In addition, some administrative studies have been undertaken, like the ‘assessment of the cost effectiveness of homeopathic clinic in the cafeteria approach’ and ‘public-private partnerships in the provision of homeopathic services in the city of Delhi, where it was tried to analyze both the strengths and weaknesses of medical pluralism in India and have worked out some solutions for implementing medical pluralism more effectively in all parts of India.

These facts and figures are a clear reflection of the belief of the people ofIndiain the homeopathic system of medicine, which, in turn, is a result of the effectiveness of homeopathy in treating a wide range of illnesses, which has convinced the Indian masses over a period of time.

Sir, as a well-respected nobel-winner scientist, who is expected to be more concerned about truth, you would have considered all these facts before publicly declaring ‘homeopathy is based on belief, a fake discipline like astrology’.  Community pay much value and reverence to words you speak out, and you are expected to keep up that responsibility when commenting on sensitive topics. You should have experimented yourselves and done a little more home work about homeopathy, before echoing the malicious propaganda of ‘anti-homeopathy skeptics’.  We would not have bothered much if you had said ‘homeopathy is not scientifically well proved’, instead of declaring it is ‘fake like astrology’.

I am sure, you have nothing personally against homeopathy or homeopaths as such. You were talking your perceptions as a truthful scientist. As an individual respecting science, scientists and scientific methods, I would not blame you for making such a statement. I know you are not a homeopath- only a scientist. I understand, as a  truthful scientist, as things stand now, you cannot say ‘homeopathy is scientific’, after seeing all these nonsense theories propagated by ‘homeopathic ‘masters’ the world over.  I understand, nobody could so far even propose a scientifically viable hypothesis about how homeopathy works, a hypothesis that could be presented as a rightful candidate for verification using scientific methods. Actually, those ‘pseudo-scientific’ homeopathic theoreticians are doing the greatest harm to homeopathy than truthful scientists like you.

Homeopaths as well as millions of patients visiting them know homeopathy works. That is their personal experience. You should think more than twice before saying it is ‘mere belief’ and ‘fake’. If you had visited a few homeopathic clinics in you city, you would realize that all people visiting homeopaths are not much less knowledgeable or more ‘superstitious’ than you. Many respected members of scientific community- may not be nobel laureates- use homeopathic medicines, knowing well that it is not ‘proven according to scientific methods’, but very much confident from experience that it is not ‘fake’ or ‘mere belief’. They experience it WORKING.  If you had ever consulted a homeopath or taken a course of homeopathic medicine yourselves, you would not have made this demeaning comment against homeopathy.

But the sad thing is that nobody knows how homeopathy works. To mask this ignorance, ‘intellectuals’ among homeopaths create fanciful theories. All these theories about homeopathy  are utter nonsense- pure absurdity. Until homeopaths stop talking nonsense ‘ultra-scientific’ theories about homeopathy, we cannot expect a fair deal from scientific community. At least homeopaths  should show the humility to say: “we know homeopathy works- that is our daily experience; but we do not know how it actually works; we need the help of scientific community to resolve this riddle”.

By saying ‘homeopathy is based on belief’, what did you actually mean?  Do you mean it is based on ‘beliefs of practitioner’, or it is working on ‘beliefs of patients’?

Do you remember, when you declare homeopathy is a ‘fake discipline’, you are saying that the Act passed by Indian parliament is ‘fake’, Central council of homeopathy is ‘fake’ and those 186 homeopathic colleges inIndiaare ‘fake’?  You mean 285000 registered homeopaths, 6000 government dispensaries and hospitals are doing ‘fake’ medical practice that may ‘endanger’ human lives? According to you, BHMS and MD degrees awarded by Indian universities are all about ‘fake’ disciplines? Do you mean those millions of people thronging daily in homeopathic clinics and getting relief for their ailments are idiots attracted to ‘fake practitioners’ due to ‘belief’ only?

Dr Venkatraman, I would earnestly request you to spare a little time to verify whether homeopathy works.  If you would co-operate, we are ready to provide as many real life proofs as you need. Only when you are ever convinced homeopathy works, we would expect you to take up topic of ‘how homeopathy works’. If you are interested in that topic, I am ready to provide details of my work which try to explain and prove ‘how homeopathy works’  on the basis of ‘Molecular Imprinting’.  I am giving link to my article, hoping you can spare some time in between your busy schedules.

Until that, kindly refrain judiciously from commenting against homeopathy. You can say: “I don’t know whether homeopathy works or not. I know all those theories about homeopathy are unscientific. If homeopathy actually works, it has yet to be proved and explained according to scientific methods”.

If you exhibit the audacity to kindly modify your earlier statement in this way, homeopathic community will be much grateful to you.


Chandran Nambiar

For Homeopathic CommunityNobel_Prize_2009-Press_Conference_KVA-08



18 thoughts on “No! Homeopathy Is Not ‘Fake’! An Open Letter To Dr.Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Nobel Laureate.

  1. how poor
    are the people
    of their knowledge
    like venkatraman
    who believe only
    what he is dealing in.
    a man with perverted ego
    can throw such dr. kent’s
    language…those who say they have tested homoeopathy and it is a failure have only exposed their own ignorance…
    ref. lesser writings.
    how people put things
    before the people and
    making the unnecessary controversies…its all
    he want to be part
    of discussion…usually
    people who attain position
    go prey of their own ego
    put such things before
    people and feel proud to be
    power over the weak…
    he thinks we are weak…
    but he dont know how a dose of sulpher 1m make his every orifice burn like
    fire…those who are not experienced homoeopathy for a period…no one has right to comment
    like he did…
    memorisers have no perception:they can only
    remember what they see,
    and they see only the surface…
    ref..kent lw.
    he is memoriser only.
    every ignorant man thinks
    that what he knows is end of knowledge..
    dr. kent.
    dont worry Jap’s..
    its always when
    truth make its voice
    more pronounced
    insecurities flows
    from holes of many..

    many sell themselves
    to multinational companies
    and earn millions
    for making one comment
    like this…..

    keep working friends…
    we at the root level
    know what homoepathy
    can offer…
    show him cases….and let him think how cancer get cured of homoeopathy…or renal failure…let him vanish his own perceptions….

    1. Also, we need to remove the myth that homoeopathy is not for acute cases as it responds late.. in my short span of practice I found homoeopathy can act with 5 mins in acute cases and patient starts improving if the medicine chosen is correct.

      1. Yes we totally agree with your comment above. I have experienced and seen many such examples. Few months back i had a kidney stone attack with severe pain and after taking a remedy had massive relief and fell asleep 20 minutes later.

  2. thank you very much chandran sir for explaining the world the true aspect of homoeopathy.

    Clearing the myths of some renowned & well educated societies.

  3. Prove it is a fake medicine mr noble prize winner. Vl donate u my both ug and pg degress which i got after. 9 long years of studiea awarded by Rughs blore… Recgnsd by govt of india.. Dont just fancy saying homoeopathy dsnt wrk…..

  4. Excellent response. I’m a medical doctor and scientist and where mainstream medicine not only failed to cure me, but half killed me with adverse effects..and instead I was cured with homeopathy though I did not then believe in homeopathy. Science is in it’s infancy and can’t explain everything. Even ‘scientific evidence’ is constantly changing because methods are flawed. We can’t even diagnose cancer unless there are 3 million cancer cells are in the body and label those people healthy. So, much goes to show about ‘scientific tests’ which are still evolving. When so called ‘Nobel’ winners (which we all know is often a dubious/political title) say silly things, it really shows how close minded and ignorant they are!

  5. Mr. Nambiar, you are 100% correct. Dr Venkotraman Ramkrishna may be a famous scientist but he is ignorant about homoeopathy. So what he commented in this matter is very very less important.

  6. Excellent response. I’m a medical doctor and scientist and where mainstream medicine not only failed to cure me, but half killed me with adverse effects..and instead I was cured with homeopathy though I did not then believe in homeopathy. Science is in it’s infancy and can’t explain everything. Even ‘scientific evidence’ is constantly changing because methods are flawed. We can’t even diagnose cancer unless there are 3 million cancer cells are in the body and label those people healthy. So, much goes to show about ‘scientific tests’ which are still evolving. When so called ‘Nobel’ winners (which we all know is often a dubious/political title) say silly things, it really shows how close minded and ignorant they are!

  7. well said dr.chandran nambiar, we homeopathic practitioners always need to prove our existence of homeopathic scientific treatment, it is always questioned by other system of medicines and non medical personals, always we are criticized by them,.. till how long it will run, homeopathy treats a base level primary health of a personality.. unlike other system of medicines we always care the patients universally.. we give much time to patient to express his feelings and ailments.. we not only do physical and observable examinations we study a patient entire parameters. infact patients turning towards our system of treatment by all others medicines.. this may be the alarming factors and worries for leading system of medicines.
    nobody has the right say our ‘genuine homeopathic system’ is fake.. we respect alot..
    and we strictly condemn dr.venkatraman ramakrishnan critics on our homeopathy.
    we respect him but we cannot be tolerate the one who disrespect homeopathy.

  8. nice one doctor. many a things which we thought was never true or non existant is a part of our life now. It is utter stupidity to comment on things that you dont know.

  9. Well said. It is like condemning without proof/without trying. The most important aspect of homeopathy is that it works. And the scientific explanation is similia similinus curenter! It contains everything. And if a thing works, then it is not really very meaningful or important if one does not (or no one) know how it works.

  10. I suggest that the viewers of this site obtain a copy of “Divided Legacy” by Harris Coulter, a book revealing the parallel histories of both allopathic medicine and homeopathic medicine from Samuel Hahnemann’s first publication about homeopathy in 1776 until 1980. I learned that homeopathy was far more scientific than allopathic medicine back in those less enlightened days over 200 years ago. Also, homeopathy was nearly wiped out in the United States by the publication of the Flexner Report of 1911, which was used to close down every institution teaching homeopathy and other alternative therap8es, including Hahnemann Hospital in Philadelphia, PA. named after the founder of homeopathy, which has been a conventional allopathic hospital since 1911, which it remains to this day.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s